Posted by
Denis Schulz on Thursday, March 29, 2007 7:51:46 AM
It’s not Bonaparte’s retreat; it’s not Cornpone’s disaster. It’s a phased redeployment; it’s a staged withdrawal; it’s a strategic retrograde. It’s keeping faith with the voters; it’s the Dunkirk option; it’s a change of course. We’re merely advancing in another direction, they say—a direction the Bush administration doesn’t like.
“Congress has an obligation to do something,” says US Representative Nancy Boyda ((D-KS). “Our bill calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops out of Iraq so that we can focus more fully on the real war on terror, which is in Afghanistan,” says House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). “The troops should not be policing a civil war,” says Senator Harry Reid (D-NV). “I look forward to even stronger steps,” says Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI). “This administration is frankly unable to run a two-car parade,” says Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY).
See? Isn’t it obvious? The Democrats are not retreating; they are not turning tail; they are not showing the white feather; they are not cutting and running. They are brave warriors—men and women—and smart too. They have heard of Fabius and Hannibal and Sun Tzu’s Art of War. Most of them haven’t seen the elephant but neither has George W. Bush—or Dick Cheney, for that matter. They remember Vietnam. They know a quagmire when they see one. Some of them remember the Korean War and what happened at the Chosen Reservoir. They remember Opie Smith. Some of them may actually think they are reincarnations of Opie Smith. For Boyda, Pelosi, Reid, Feingold, Clinton et al, in their own pathetic way, are attempting to do what Opie did in Korea—retreat in another direction.
And who was Opie Smith? Opie was Oliver P. Smith. He commanded the 1st Marine Division in 1950. Opie and his 30,000 Gyrenes were surrounded by 70,000 Chinese Communist ‘volunteers’ at the Chosen Reservoir in the bitter winter of ‘50-51 with temperatures hovering at twenty below zero. Out of everything but guts, O.P. struck out for Hungnam, taking his dead and wounded with him in one of the epic retrograde marches in the history of warfare. When someone suggested he was retreating, O.P. said, “Retreat, Hell! We’re just advancing in another direction!”
Is that the Democratic plan? It seems to be what they are saying—isn’t it?
The quagmire is up to the knees. Abe Lincoln would have said the bottom was out of the tub. Lincoln was a Republican and he had a Congress full of Copperheads—Democrats—who’s hearts weren’t in the war, sort of like Pelosi and Feingold and Reid. Pull out of Georgia, pull out of Mississippi said the Copperheads—negotiate, negotiate, then Nathan Bedford Forrest and John Hunt Morgan will stop terrorizing us. Did they mean al-Qaeda and Islamic Jihad? If Lincoln hadn’t invaded the South there would be no Civil War and we would be at peace, they said. Was Lincoln fighting the war to free the slaves or for cotton to feed New England textile mills? Is Bush fighting to free the slaves or is it for oil? Michael Moore says it is for oil. Who is Teddy Kennedy going to believe?
And so it came to pass and the Democrats won the Presidency in 2008 and lo and behold, before the next midterm election, Nancy Pelosi said, “Our bill calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops out of Afghanistan so that we can focus more fully on the real war on terror, which is in the Gaza Strip and Israel.” “The troops should not be policing a civil war,” agreed Harry Reid, for, indeed, Afghanistan had become Iraq II, a civil war. It was time for another phased redeployment, another staged withdrawal, another strategic retrograde. Well, that made sense. What worked in Iraq should work in Afghanistan. Besides—it was what the voters wanted. The withdrawal went off without a hitch and there was peace in our time. But things weren’t going that well in the Gaza Strip and Israel. There were car bombs and suicide attacks.
And there were more elections and Nancy Pelosi said, “Our bill calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops out of the Middle East so that we can focus more fully on the real war on terror, which is along the Mexican border.“ It wasn’t easy. “I look forward to even stronger steps than in Afghanistan,” enthused Russ Feingold. Jimmy Carter was called out of retirement. He was the only Democrat who understood the Roadmap to Peace in the Middle East and after meeting with the Muslim Students Association and the Palestine Solidarity Movement in Plains, Georgia, Jimmy announced a plan that would end apartheid for all time. America would divest from Israel and if that didn’t work an embargo would be declared. It was tough love but something had to be done to bring the Zionists to their knees, ah, to the bargaining table. “We can’t stay in Israel forever,” warned Harry Reid. He was right. Once began, retrograde movements are difficult to stop. Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel—John F. Kennedy’s domino theory. America needed George S. Patton and Teddy Roosevelt—they had George Soros and Teddy Kennedy.
One election followed another and Uncle Sam withdrew to Festung America. There would be no fighting on the beaches, no fighting in the fields, no fighting anywhere—not in El Paso or in the streets in front of the Grand Saudi Mosque in Boston. Yet the border seethed. New Mexico became a province of Old Mexico. The Minute Men and the Navajo Nation became allies. Everyone despaired. There was one last election and then Madame President Nancy Pelosi addressed the nation. “Our bill,” she said, “calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops from the Mexican border so that we can focus on the real war on terror, which is in Dearborn, Michigan.” She paused; then continued, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. Therefore I am removing our troops from the banks of the Rio Grande and assigning them to the Alamo.” There would be no Fort Sumter.
A hush fell over Congress assembled. Even Robert Byrd was at a loss for words. Keith Ellison snickered. At last, Virgil Goode (R-VA) spoke up. “But you can’t do that, Madame President,” he said. “The United Nations gave the Alamo to Mexico in the settlement of 2020.”
President Pelosi smiled. “ Our relations with Mexico are exceedingly good,” she said as if talking to a child. “I am sure President Villa will give us a few acres—enough for the Jane Fonda Brigade to hang their washing.”
The Democratic Party has not supported the war in Iraq and will not support a war in Afghanistan. An American withdrawal will lead to a disaster. Al-Qaeda will not disband and go home. They will move lock, stock and RPGs to Afghanistan, ally themselves with radical Islamists and warlords, and the real war for Afghanistan will commence. Sooner or later the Democrats will insist on pulling out. They are not in this war for the long haul and never have been. Indeed, support for Israel, America’s only ally in the Middle East, has been eroding rapidly in the Democratic Party and Pelosi and her pals could easily stab the Israelis in the back while withdrawing to Festung America just as another generation of Democrats deserted the South Vietnamese in the 1970s. The terrorists have taken the measure of the Democratic Party and know in which direction they are advancing—Iraq today, the Mexican border tomorrow.
e